> 
> From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/01/08 Mon PM 09:21:27 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Ford and Microsoft go wireless
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:52:42AM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> > On 09/01/07, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > I guess a lot has to do with what you do with your car.
> > > My 31 year old son is looking for a new vehicle & is having a hard time
> > > considering any without Blue tooth technology due to the convenience it
> > > offers, tho I'm not sure he's willing to pay extra for it. I read 
> > > somewhere
> > > that this technology can add up to $1,000 USD to the cost to the customer.
> > 
> > That's what I just love about car manufacturers, $10 worth of tech to
> > the manufacturer is $1k to the client. Case in point; the integrated
> > nav unit in my vehicle is a $5k option yet it's slower and clunkier
> > than most $500 stand alone units. :-(
> 
> And probably doesn't work as well, either.
> 
> I can't use my (Bluetooth) Treo 700w with my (Bluetooth) BMW Z4, even
> though the BMW supposedly offers full integration - sound through the
> car audio speakers, and a microphone on the steering column.  That's
> because the car wants to know the contents of the phone book (so it
> can identify an incoming call on the in-car display, etc.).  But it
> expects phone numbers to consist of just the digits 0-9.  Unfortunately
> the Treo is a Windows Mobile 5 device, and uses Outlook Mobile as the
> contact manager.  This displays phone numbers formatted for human eyes
> complete with parentheses and hyphens. This upsets the car, and so it
> drops the Bluetooth connection :-(

This is getting dangerously close to DSLR/aperture simulator territory......


-----------------------------------------
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to