On 1/09/07 8:55 AM, "Shel Belinkoff", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I understand what you're trying to do with this one, but, imo, it > misses the mark (as i see the mark to be). I believe the photo could be > stronger with a different (or even non-existent) title, as the title has > led me to some expectations. It's nicely done from a technical point, > that's for certain. > > Shel > > > >> [Original Message] >> From: Bruce Dayton > >> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4227.htm I think the title is creative, otherwise, it is just an ordinary sight, technical excellence aside. But that's a lot of "piles" ! They could have done it a better way without crowding the place. Ken -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
