Good to hear. I have the Spyder 1? bought from MR, and i, being a real chicken have yet to install this, as, basically, i'm afraid i'll screw somthing up.
Words like this will help me over the hump and Spyder my Viewsonic and get my 2400 printing. :-) Dave Quoting Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I run Gamma 2.2 on my Mac with Apple cinema display. The monitor is > calibrated with a Spyder 2. My new Epson R2400 duplicates the screen > image flawlessly as did my previous Epson 2200. I don't see that > there's anything to be gained using G 1.8. > Paul > On Jan 12, 2007, at 6:07 PM, Bronek Kozicki wrote: > >> keith_w wrote: >>>> but pls. remeber to use gamma 2.2 , as this is the standard. >>> >>> For whom? For what? >> >> >> good question. You will find answer in "Color Management" by Bruce >> Fraser, Chris Murphy, Fred Bunting. In my (2nd) edition it is in >> chapter 6 . Needless to say, gamma 2.2 is recommended (there) because >> "in our testing, we've found that calibrating to around gamma 2.2 >> produces the smoothest display of gradients, with little or no visible >> banding or posterization". >> >> Surely, you can use whatever works for you, but I assumed that OP is >> confused enough. >> >> If I can suggest something to OP that would be: >> - learn basics of colour maganegent (above mentioned book is very >> good) >> - buy colorimeter and calibrate monitor using hardware. I'd lend mine, >> but Australia is bit too far away from UK. >> >> >> B. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > Equine Photography in York Region -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
