Why not use a site where you're at least minimally protected? Photo.net makes it clear that the photographer is the owner of the copyright. And it's faster. Paul On Jan 13, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 14/01/07, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Anyone would be a fool to agree to that. > > Thanks Bob, I use it but I certainly don't use it to host any images > that I wouldn't be prepared to loose (nor would any be potentially > attractive to the for that matter). Fact is if you make anything > public there is the potential for it to be abused whether it be legal > or otherwise. > > -- > Rob Studdert > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA > Tel +61-2-9554-4110 > UTC(GMT) +10 Hours > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ > Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
