On 14/01/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not use a site where you're at least minimally protected? > Photo.net makes it clear that the photographer is the owner of the > copyright. And it's faster.
Because Photo.net so slow it's ridiculous here and it's very limited if you don't wish to sell out for an annual subscription. PhotoBucket is designed for direct linking, they promote it. So I use it for posting images in web fora, and lastly I have a desktop drag and drop interface that allows me to use any of my DAM tools to select and initiate an up-load. So it's cost effective, convenient and fast to access and update. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
