HAR! No doubt. Paul On Jan 21, 2007, at 8:38 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > It's no accident that equipment failures occur when > the equipment is needed most. Most modern devices > incorporate a USD (User Stress Detector) chip. These > sophisticated devices use the day of the week, hour, > and secret biometric measurements (such as how hard > one hits the buttons) to detect the user's stress > level. They then randomly generate failures with a > frequency proportional to the cube of the user's > stress times the inverse square of the availability of > service. > > You could look it up! <bg> > > Rick > > --- Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Seems like it frequently happens that way. I was in >> the middle of >> printing Christmas gifts the morning of Friday, Dec. >> 22 when my R800 >> refused to feed paper. Fortunately, there's an >> Epson service center >> about 15 minutes from home. They had it repaired >> and back in my hands >> by 3:00 PM. >> >> -P >> >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >> Bad timing for an equipment failure. >>> Paul >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________ > We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love > (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. > http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
