My point is if you know what your doing and & the subject lends itself to the process, an APS sensor can be used to create very high resolution images.
BTW, That shot was 3 images captured with the K10D & stitched together. I could just as easily used a longer FL & taken 20+ shots to produce an even higher resolution image. The limitations of the APS sensor, force you to be a bit more crafty :-) Cheers, Dave At 02:08 PM 22/01/2007, you wrote: >Whats your point here? That higher resolution >is or isnt useful? There are no 25Mp aps format >SLRS are there and even if there were they would >be lens limited compared to larger film or digital >formats... >jco > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >David Savage >Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 10:37 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: RE: Film vs. Digital - not a religion > > >At 10:50 AM 22/01/2007, J. C. O'Connell wrote: > >I dont agree that the higher resolution that > >medium and large format photography provides > >is moot or unnecessary in typical photography > >unless you never print anything bigger than > >4x6" or never make a web image display larger > >than 1200x800 (both being rough numbers). > >jco > >What about a 9938x2651 image? (~3M) > ><http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/images/Container-Ship_2_2lrg.jpg> > >Pretty good detail for a piddly APS-C sensor. > >Cheers, > >Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
