This makes no sense at all, digital capture has exposure latitude just like film does which means BOTH overexposure or underexposure will noticably degrade the image at some point with most subjects and the widest exposure latitude digital is still not as wide as the widest exposure latitude films at this point. jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 3:06 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Film vs. Digital - not a religion No, not really. That's a digital myth. Underexposure is the enemy of good digital photography On Jan 21, 2007, at 2:51 PM, Jens Bladt wrote: > No, not really. Digital images of this sort must be underexposed, > in order > to avoid burned out highlights, to which thery are more prone than > film > images. > regards > > Jens Bladt > Nytarkort / Greeting Card: > http://www.jensbladt.dk/godtnytaar2007/lydshow.html > > http://www.jensbladt.dk > +45 56 63 77 11 > +45 23 43 85 77 > Skype: jensbladt248 > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne > af Paul > Stenquist > Sendt: 21. januar 2007 20:07 > Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Emne: Re: Film vs. Digital - not a religion > > > Half of your examples are grossly underexposed. I'm guessing those > are the digital samples. That makes the comparison irrelevant, > because underexposure causes image degradation. > Paul > On Jan 21, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Jens Bladt wrote: > >> To me this question is not a religion - just at matter of choosing >> the right >> gear for the job. >> Well, I know Luminous Landscape says a Canon 1Ds does better than a >> scan >> from a Pentax 6x7. >> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/shootout.shtml >> >> But paper is patient. So are HTML-files. >> But what can we do, really? >> >> Have any of you guys done group-portraits with a digital camera - >> APS or >> Full Frame? >> If you have such group portraits, showing 20-30 people, I'd love to >> see one >> face croped out of it. >> A crop showing 5-10% of the total frame area. >> Just to see if you can do this better than me. >> >> So, for staters I made a small comparison here: >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594491741789/ >> >> Comments are most welcome >> Regards >> Jens Bladt >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date: >> 01/20/2007 >> 22:31 >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date: > 01/20/2007 > 22:31 > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.3/642 - Release Date: > 01/20/2007 > 22:31 > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
