> Nice shot ... Thanks!
> Hard to say much about any lens from a low-rez web photo, but it > looks like it does ok. I don't usually buy Sigma lenses because the > experiences I've had with Sigma equipment have not been positive. They are known to have problems particularly in Canon mount. > I used the A24 from the beginning of 2005 when I found it in the > local photo shop's used shelf for $120 until I bought the FA20-35. I > auctioned it off in Spring of 2006 and it returned over $200. Yours does seem to perform much better than mine did especially at f/4. > Far as I can tell from Boj's site, the K24/2.8 and A24/2.8 were > optically identical, just the mount changed. Yes it would seem so, apart from perhaps the coating. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you have received an email in error please notify Carmel College on [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete all copies of it from your systems. Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails and email attachments for viruses we cannot guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor accept any responsibility for viruses. Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot be held responsible for the views or expressions of the author. The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel College and Carmel College cannot be held responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the contents of a message. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
