And many still are. 
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Two years ago they were happy with six to eight.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'm not sure that there is a megapixel war. Most advanced amateurs seem 
> > quite 
> happy with 10 megapixels. 
> > Paul
> >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >   
> >> To release a camera that doesn't keep up in the megapixil wars or one 
> >> that does with bad high ISO performance would be marketing suicide.  
> >> Take your choice.  I expect that they'll release promise and release the 
> >> lenses they need to fill in the line and you'll be happy.
> >>
> >> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >>     
> >>> They've never promised DFA lenses in short focal lengths, only in the 
> >>> 300 to 600 range. I just don't see them introducing a camera that can't 
> >>> use the new DA* lenses at the same time the DA* lenses go on sale. That 
> >>> would be marketing suicide.
> >>> Paul
> >>> On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:05 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> A 1.3x crop would be covered by most of the existing DA lenses.  I 
> >>>> could
> >>>> see them with a warning just like the flash warning built into the 
> >>>> ZX-5n
> >>>> when you used a lens, (or just using a focal length on a zoom), that
> >>>> would cause the Flash to Vignette.  Sure it's a stopgap but they also
> >>>> have a promise of the D FA lenses waiting in the wings.
> >>>>
> >>>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> It would obviously have to be an image circle that worked with the
> >>>>> current DA lenses. The FAs are almost all out of production and new
> >>>>> DAs are being introduced all the time. They won't introduce a camera
> >>>>> that has no lens support.
> >>>>> Paul
> >>>>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 10:49 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>>>  This will
> >>>>>>> almost certainly necissitate a lower crop factor. More likely ~1.3x
> >>>>>>> than full-frame, though.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>> I've been expecting something like this for some time.  If they 
> >>>>>> intend
> >>>>>> it to be anything other than marketing hype that is.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mark Roberts wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>>> P. J. Alling wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>> From DP Review post
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>>>> * The release of the 645D is postponed in order to priorities on
> >>>>>>>>> DSLRs
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>>>                   
> >>>>>>>> The wait begins to look infinite.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>> If the rumours of the next canon being 22MP are accurate (or even
> >>>>>>> close), that would explain the delay. "Infinite" delay might be the
> >>>>>>> best course of action unless they can go straight to 30MP.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?
> >>>>>>>> forum=1036&message=21896693
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>             
> >>>>>>>>                 
> >>>>>>> To present new DSLR's" at PMA seems very optimistic. How about
> >>>>>>> "announce" new DSLR's? I expect the K1D (or whatever it ends up 
> >>>>>>> being
> >>>>>>> called) to be announced some time this year, but "presented", even
> >>>>>>> under glass? I'd be very surprised. I'd love to be wrong, though...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There have long been rumours of Pentax working on their own CMOS
> >>>>>>> sensor. Given the continuing megapixel wars (Canon going over 17MP
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>> Nikon going to 15-16 MP), I'm guessing it'll be around 15MP. This
> >>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>> almost certainly necissitate a lower crop factor. More likely ~1.3x
> >>>>>>> than full-frame, though.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> >>>>>>                        -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -- 
> >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> >>>>                  -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>>
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> -- 
> >> --
> >>
> >> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> >>                    -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> >>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>     
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> 
> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
>                       -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to