We're talking future, as in months/years, not tomorrow.  You just bought a 
10MP camera for less than a 6MP.

On the 30D...  It'll be replaced with a higher MP model.



Tom C.

>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: In case you were waiting for the 645D...
>Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:58:19 +0000
>
>To go to a larger sensor would cause a huge price increase. That's why 
>we're happy here :-). Canon still sells the 8 megapixel 30D for more than 
>their 10 megapixel consumer model, and they sell a lot of them. Anyway, 
>looking at the lens roadmap for 2007 and beyond, it's obvious that only DA 
>is in the near future.
>Paul
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > It's obvious that whether one calls it a "megapixel war" or not, that
> > manufacturers will continue to produce cameras with greater and greater
> > megapixel resolution, within the limits of noise handling and physics, 
>as
> > cost comes down.
> >
> > To not to so is to relegate oneself to a has-been in the camera 
>business.
> >
> > To deny that, is to ignore the obvious.
> >
> > Most advanced amateurs seem happy with 10MP, because the cost of those
> > cameras is all that most advance amateurs can afford at the present 
>time,
> > and that's what's being released in their price range.  You were happy 
>with
> > your *ist D, but when the K10D came out, you bought it.
> >
> > Have you asked most advanced amateurs? :-)
> >
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]>
> > >Subject: Re: In case you were waiting for the 645D...
> > >Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:40:47 +0000
> > >
> > >And many still are.
> > >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Two years ago they were happy with six to eight.
> > > >
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > I'm not sure that there is a megapixel war. Most advanced amateurs
> > >seem quite
> > > > happy with 10 megapixels.
> > > > > Paul
> > > > >  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> > > > > From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > >
> > > > >> To release a camera that doesn't keep up in the megapixil wars or 
>one
> > > > >> that does with bad high ISO performance would be marketing 
>suicide.
> > > > >> Take your choice.  I expect that they'll release promise and 
>release
> > >the
> > > > >> lenses they need to fill in the line and you'll be happy.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> They've never promised DFA lenses in short focal lengths, only 
>in
> > >the
> > > > >>> 300 to 600 range. I just don't see them introducing a camera 
>that
> > >can't
> > > > >>> use the new DA* lenses at the same time the DA* lenses go on 
>sale.
> > >That
> > > > >>> would be marketing suicide.
> > > > >>> Paul
> > > > >>> On Feb 2, 2007, at 12:05 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> A 1.3x crop would be covered by most of the existing DA lenses. 
>  I
> > > > >>>> could
> > > > >>>> see them with a warning just like the flash warning built into 
>the
> > > > >>>> ZX-5n
> > > > >>>> when you used a lens, (or just using a focal length on a zoom),
> > >that
> > > > >>>> would cause the Flash to Vignette.  Sure it's a stopgap but 
>they
> > >also
> > > > >>>> have a promise of the D FA lenses waiting in the wings.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> It would obviously have to be an image circle that worked with 
>the
> > > > >>>>> current DA lenses. The FAs are almost all out of production 
>and
> > >new
> > > > >>>>> DAs are being introduced all the time. They won't introduce a
> > >camera
> > > > >>>>> that has no lens support.
> > > > >>>>> Paul
> > > > >>>>> On Feb 1, 2007, at 10:49 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>  This will
> > > > >>>>>>> almost certainly necissitate a lower crop factor. More 
>likely
> > >~1.3x
> > > > >>>>>>> than full-frame, though.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I've been expecting something like this for some time.  If 
>they
> > > > >>>>>> intend
> > > > >>>>>> it to be anything other than marketing hype that is.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Mark Roberts wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> P. J. Alling wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> From DP Review post
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> * The release of the 645D is postponed in order to 
>priorities
> > >on
> > > > >>>>>>>>> DSLRs
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> The wait begins to look infinite.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> If the rumours of the next canon being 22MP are accurate (or
> > >even
> > > > >>>>>>> close), that would explain the delay. "Infinite" delay might 
>be
> > >the
> > > > >>>>>>> best course of action unless they can go straight to 30MP.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?
> > > > >>>>>>>> forum=1036&message=21896693
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> To present new DSLR's" at PMA seems very optimistic. How 
>about
> > > > >>>>>>> "announce" new DSLR's? I expect the K1D (or whatever it ends 
>up
> > > > >>>>>>> being
> > > > >>>>>>> called) to be announced some time this year, but 
>"presented",
> > >even
> > > > >>>>>>> under glass? I'd be very surprised. I'd love to be wrong,
> > >though...
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> There have long been rumours of Pentax working on their own 
>CMOS
> > > > >>>>>>> sensor. Given the continuing megapixel wars (Canon going 
>over
> > >17MP
> > > > >>>>>>> and
> > > > >>>>>>> Nikon going to 15-16 MP), I'm guessing it'll be around 15MP.
> > >This
> > > > >>>>>>> will
> > > > >>>>>>> almost certainly necissitate a lower crop factor. More 
>likely
> > >~1.3x
> > > > >>>>>>> than full-frame, though.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> > > > >>>>>>                  -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > >>>>>> [email protected]
> > > > >>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> > > > >>>>                    -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > >>>> [email protected]
> > > > >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> --
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> > > > >>                      -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > >> [email protected]
> > > > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
> > > >                         -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >[email protected]
> > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > [email protected]
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>[email protected]
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to