Interesting. You're the first person to express that opinion. For what it is--offset printing on light magazine paper--I think they are better than most. I would have increased the contrast a bit, but hey.
So either your standards are too high, or you saw a bad copy, or were expecting an insert with fiber prints made for me by a master printer at Picto... Me, I'm content with the way the work is represented there. :) On 2/8/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I finally got a chance to see a copy of this issue, and I must say I was > very disappointed. Not in Juan's work, but the reproduction didn't do > the photos justice. Very poor quality printing and photographic > reproduction. > > > Juan Buhler wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The current issue of the British Black and White Photography magazine > > has a nice portfolio article about my photos, written by Mike > > Johnston, and including seven of my pictures. There isn't much online, > > but here is a link to their site: > > > > http://www.thegmcgroup.com/item--Black-and-White-Photography--1003BW.html > > > > Despite any resemblances, that's not me in the cover :) > > > > > > Anyway--thought some of you might want to check it out. All pictures > > published were taken with the istD, and it prominently says so next to > > each. > > > > Thanks, > > > > j > > > > > > > -- > -- > > The more I know of men, the more I like my dog. > -- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Juan Buhler - http://www.jbuhler.com photoblog: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com a book: http://www.jbuhler.com/book.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
