I have the magazine too ... and I agree with you, Juan. The printing is good for a monthly of this type.
G On Feb 9, 2007, at 11:30 AM, Juan Buhler wrote: > Interesting. You're the first person to express that opinion. > > For what it is--offset printing on light magazine paper--I think they > are better than most. I would have increased the contrast a bit, but > hey. > > So either your standards are too high, or you saw a bad copy, or were > expecting an insert with fiber prints made for me by a master printer > at Picto... > > Me, I'm content with the way the work is represented there. > > :) > > > > On 2/8/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I finally got a chance to see a copy of this issue, and I must say >> I was >> very disappointed. Not in Juan's work, but the reproduction >> didn't do >> the photos justice. Very poor quality printing and photographic >> reproduction. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
