I mean Ann... :-)
Tom C. >From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Comparing Photos >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:09:06 -0700 > >No problem Anne. > > > >Tom C. > > > >From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: Comparing Photos > >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:58:49 -0500 > > > > > > > >Kenneth Waller wrote: > > > > >>I did find it, looking for the right word - puzzling - that the three > > >>photos were often judged in comparison to one another. > > >> > > >> > > > > > >Probably wouldn't have happened if they were posted many days apart. > > > > > >Kenneth Waller > > > > > > > > > > >I was one who "compared" the first to the second (never saw the third > >until now, tom) - > >and I think Ken is right. But I have to confess to a habit of comparing > >everyone's photos to > >each other that are done by the same photograher - seems normal to me. > > I like the > >1st of those three the best, the middle I don't like much, the third is > >nice - the geometry of it particularly, > > but makes me want to clean my glasses, too. > >... which may partly be a function of my eyesight having a problem with > >low contrast - that is, the low contrast shots may not really be as low > >contrast as I am seeing them. > > > >just a couple of cents > > > >ann > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
