In Vista, why not. In XP defenitely not. But maybe I'll change my mind in a couple weeks...
2007/2/20, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Feb 20, 2007, at 6:23 AM, Charles Robinson wrote: > > >> What makes one interface superior to another? I run XP configured to > >> classic style with no animations or sound effects at home. At work > >> I am forced to use XP in all it's XPness. The animations just > >> slow things > >> down too much when I know exactly what I want to make happen. > > > > You'll be pleased to note that you can do much the same with Vista. > > Switch the "performance" options from "Let Windows decide" to "best > > performance" (or similar words, I'm going from memory here). Turns > > off a lot of the ugly graphics and animations. Whew! > > What I don't understand is why they think people would want them, and > conversely why some people seem to like them. > > G > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille ---------------------- *ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
