Mmm a Leica lens on an EOS body?
Should bring a nice quality result but what a weird look if you ask me.

I wouldn't wannt put a DA18-55 on my KX ...

2007/2/24, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think if Leica was really smart, they'd redesign the few R lenses that
> don't clear the mirror on the 5D so that they were safe to mount, and
> then release a Leica-made REOS adaptor. The money is in the lenses and
> the R glass is rather popular these days with those willing to give up
> AF and open aperture metering to get truly world-class ultra-wides on
> EOS. R lenses would likely be more popular than they are if it wasn't
> for the fact that mirror clearance is more of an issue with R lenses
> than with C/Y or OM lenses (Which are the other two truly popular
> options, Nikon users having tended to go Nikon for digital).
>
> -Adam
>
>
> John Celio wrote:
> > Just curious: Considering this was news years ago, what prompted you to post
> > about it?
> >
> > At my last job, we were a major Leica dealer for the Bay Area.  Most of our
> > Leica sales were for the M series stuff, but we had a very dedicated base of
> > R users, including a couple employees.  The people who used Rs, especially
> > the last two models, swore by them: they're built like a tank, they're big
> > but comfortable, they have all the features one needs, etc.  A couple years
> > before the shop closed, we were in the process of designing a Leica Boutique
> > to be built inside the store.  Camera West, down in Monterey, has a
> > beautiful Leica Boutique (the first, I believe) that I saw around the time
> > Reed's was planning theirs, and it blew me away.  It's heaven for Leica
> > users, and apparrently Leica was working with a very small number of camera
> > shops around the country to build more boutiques like it.  Sadly, Reed's
> > boutique never happened.
> >
> > Quick on-topic note: towards the end, Reed's was working on a deal with
> > Pentax to become a major Pentax dealer.  It didn't happen either, but wow,
> > it would have been a dream come true for me.
> >
> > I loved the M cameras, but I can understand that people would want Leica
> > optics with the accuracy of an SLR.  I figure a rangefinder wouldn't be
> > ideal for shooting portraits, for instance.
> >
> > Two or three of our more well-off customers ordered the Digital Module R.  I
> > got to hold an R9 with the module attatched for about 10 seconds, not enough
> > time to form an opinion, but I thought it was kinda nice.  Hefty, sure, but
> > that's the R series for you.
> >
> > It's too bad the DMR is no longer in production.  I hope Leica comes up with
> > something new to keep the R series going.  Perhaps a digital-only R10, but
> > smaller and lighter, to attract new users?
> >
> > John
> >
> > --
> > http://www.neovenator.com
> > http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 1:22 PM
> > Subject: Leica Camera AG - R System
> >
> >
> >> http://www.leica-camera.us/photography/r_system/
> >>
> >> For film & digital. It's shoots on film and with digital back - it's
> >> DSLR in seconds.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>


-- 
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
----------------------
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to