Here's a rather extreme demonstration of flare with the FA31:

   http://homepage.mac.com/godders/FA31-flare.jpg

I'd noticed some odd veiling softness/contrast reduction under  
certain circumstances and found this example, taken at night with a  
strong street light just out of the frame, which showed me the flare  
pattern clearly. Notice how it has a sharp edge inset from the edge  
of the frame.

A good lens hood would likely eliminate it for the DSLR, if you could  
fit a good lens hood with that fixed hood. Grr.

For me, the 43 Limited is going to replace the 35/2 and 50/1.4 ... it  
slots in between the 28 and 70 perfectly. The kit I've assembled  now  
is very complete, for my purposes: DA14, DA21, FA28, FA43, DA70 and  
the DA50-200. All (except the 14) very compact and light, just the  
right FoV coverage, very high image quality throughout. The graph of  
FoV vs FL is pretty nice:

   http://homepage.mac.com/godders/FoVs-Pentax-DSLR.jpg

I still use the FA20-35 too ... it's such a good wide-normal zoom for  
when I want to carry just one lens.

Godfrey

On Feb 25, 2007, at 8:04 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:

> I see... Indeed it escaped my mind (or actually memory) that you had
> 31 Limited. In fact, it is fast (f 1.8) and I find it just right for
> K10D (without a grip). Though I agree with you about the hood and
> hence rather strange lens cap. I did not have a chance to use FA 35/2
> AL though. Although I admit that having 43 Lim, the idea of 35 mm
> seems just a bit redundant - the difference in FOV is there, but it is
> not that big.
>
> My (black) 31 Limited never flared yet. I shall be more aware that it
> may flare, 'cause you say you had experienced it.
>
>
> On 2/25/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:18 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>>
>>> Have you played with 31 Limited?
>>
>> I owned the 31 Limited first. Nice imaging qualities (but some
>> annoying flare), irritatingly stupid fixed lens hood, awkward lens
>> cap, big and heavy. Not enough of an improvement in imaging and too
>> annoying in size and weight, with that hood, compared the FA35/2 AL
>> to warrant a 3x price tag, IMO.
>>
>> That's why I sold it.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to