Sigh... A good story is a good story, except when it touches a religious nerve. Archeology which a hundred years ago was thought to be an enemy of Christianity is actually turning out to provide evidence to the historicity of the faith. There are many elements that were a matter of faith then that is now a matter of fact. But that has not stopped many from spinning stories borne from their imagination--"redeemed" or otherwise :-) Even orthodox Mel Gibson placed some "apocryphal" inserts in the Passion.
Ahh...artistic licence (check out this link: http://www.dangardner.ca/Colmay1006.html). Has anyone dropped their lens from their camera bodies? On 3/2/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Less credible actually. There's eye-witness accounts in the Bible (not just > Jesus), real places, names, chronology that has proven to be accurate by > archaeological discovery. The fact that really the entire world bases their > calendar on the birth of this one man has some power behind it (yes I know > there are other calendars, but to work in the modern world one must > convert). > > Tom C. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Bong Manayon http://www.bong.uni.cc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
