Appreciate the feedback. I tried punching them up a bit, but I didn't like the result. I thought if changed the mood. My monitor is calibrated, but that doesn't mean we're seeing exactly the same thing. As rendered, they print quite nicely. Paul On Mar 3, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I like this one more than the first ... It seems to be more 'real'. > Together they are building up the context I'm looking for. > > Technically, the sharpness and detailing are flawless, but again I > find the rendering too much in middle tones, missing a bit of sparkle > or punch that I'd like to see. > > Godfrey > > > On Mar 3, 2007, at 5:07 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> Thanks for the feedback. It was originally displayed as part of a set. >> I may resurrect some more of these. It wasn't really my favorite from >> the series, but I was interested to see how people responded to the >> crop and BW rendering. I did add another of the set to my photo.net >> page this morning. it's here: >> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5670679&size=lg >> On Mar 3, 2007, at 1:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >>> Hadnt gotten to this one yet, Paul. >>> >>> It's not particularly appealing to me as a standalone photo, it >>> belongs as part of a set to have some context. >>> >>> Technically, it's nicely done although the rendering lacks some >>> sparkle. >>> >>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667450&size=md >>>> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
