Hmm. Well, I think my problem here is that the set concentrates too  
strongly on the model and not enough on the context of the  
surroundings. That lends them all a feeling of being posed, rather  
than being a characterization of trailer park life.

Of the set, first
   http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5670679
and then, a little less strongly,
   http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5670828
make the transition into "reality" best for my eye.

Godfrey

On Mar 3, 2007, at 7:53 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

> Hi Godders,
> I've posted eight from the series:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=701586
>
>
> On Mar 3, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, not for me. Standing alone, it appears a staged
>> photograph emulating a young person faking a dissipated lifestyle. It
>> does not seem a real situation. If there's some broader context to it
>> that has a relation to real life I'd have to see more photos to
>> establish the context.
>>
>> G
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2007, at 12:37 AM, Bob W wrote:
>>
>>> Godfrey,
>>>
>>> surely the context is all there in the material evidence - trailer
>>> park, fake leopard skin, Budweiser, cigarettes, rivets. That ain't a
>>> photograph, that's anthropology.
>>>
>>>> Hadnt gotten to this one yet, Paul.
>>>>
>>>> It's not particularly appealing to me as a standalone photo, it
>>>> belongs as part of a set to have some context.
>>>>
>>>> Technically, it's nicely done although the rendering lacks
>>>> some sparkle.
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5667450&size=md


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to