Well yeah. I've known people like Ken Rockwell. Odds are that when one talks that much, they are bound to be right about something every once in a while. :-)
Tom C. >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: OT: Nikon D3 >Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:10:24 -0500 > >I'm not saying there's no such thing as a Nikon D3, just commenting on >the source. > >Tom C wrote: > > I would suggest at the very least: > > > > 1. He didn't generate the mockup artwork of the D3 himself. > > 2. It looks suspiciously similar to the 645D mockups with the same > > approximate resolution and likely the same approximate sensor. > > 3. If it uses existing Nikon 35mm form-factor lenses, it will have a >market > > advantage over the 645D, over and above the name alone. > > > > Tom C. > > > > > > > > > >> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: OT: Nikon D3 > >> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:03:39 -0500 > >> > >> He had credibility before this???? > >> > >> Mike Hamilton wrote: > >> > >>> http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3.htm > >>> > >>> Pardon me as I die laughing. Does KR expect any credibility posting > >>> that photo? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> -- > >> Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf > >> thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > > > > > > > > > > >-- >Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf >thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
