I'm not saying there's no such thing as a Nikon D3, just commenting on the source.
Tom C wrote: > I would suggest at the very least: > > 1. He didn't generate the mockup artwork of the D3 himself. > 2. It looks suspiciously similar to the 645D mockups with the same > approximate resolution and likely the same approximate sensor. > 3. If it uses existing Nikon 35mm form-factor lenses, it will have a market > advantage over the 645D, over and above the name alone. > > Tom C. > > > > >> From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: OT: Nikon D3 >> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:03:39 -0500 >> >> He had credibility before this???? >> >> Mike Hamilton wrote: >> >>> http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3.htm >>> >>> Pardon me as I die laughing. Does KR expect any credibility posting >>> that photo? >>> >>> >>> >> -- >> Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf >> thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
