I would suggest at the very least: 1. He didn't generate the mockup artwork of the D3 himself. 2. It looks suspiciously similar to the 645D mockups with the same approximate resolution and likely the same approximate sensor. 3. If it uses existing Nikon 35mm form-factor lenses, it will have a market advantage over the 645D, over and above the name alone.
Tom C. >From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: OT: Nikon D3 >Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 01:03:39 -0500 > >He had credibility before this???? > >Mike Hamilton wrote: > > http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3.htm > > > > Pardon me as I die laughing. Does KR expect any credibility posting > > that photo? > > > > > > >-- >Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf >thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
