I think Ryan was being facetious. On Mar 8, 2007, at 8:14 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> I thought you meant the 18-200. Seems a bit excessive for a walk about > lens. And a bit limiting unless you plan to take photos from blocks > away. > > Ryan Lee wrote: >> The link on that page is javascript, but here's the content link: >> http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/news/200_500_28.htm >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:16 PM >> Subject: OT: Sigma 200-500 2.8 EX DG >> >> >> >>> http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/index.htm >>> >>> Hey how's this for a walkabout lens? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Ryan >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >> >> > > > -- > Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw > uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
