Actually, I think that Sigma is size-envious or something. You remember this 2100/4 beast published not a long ago? Sigma couldn't do it this long, so they went zoom and they went f2.8 ;-).
I am being sarcastic. On 3/8/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Ryan was being facetious. > > On Mar 8, 2007, at 8:14 AM, P. J. Alling wrote: > > > I thought you meant the 18-200. Seems a bit excessive for a walk about > > lens. And a bit limiting unless you plan to take photos from blocks > > away. > > > > Ryan Lee wrote: > >> The link on that page is javascript, but here's the content link: > >> http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/news/200_500_28.htm > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 10:16 PM > >> Subject: OT: Sigma 200-500 2.8 EX DG > >> > >> > >> > >>> http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/index.htm > >>> > >>> Hey how's this for a walkabout lens? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Ryan > >>> > >>> -- > >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw > > uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
