I'm entitled to state my opinions too on a free list. I said that *I* didn't give a damn about the aesthetics of the Sony lump .... not that others couldn't or shouldn't comment on it, or even that commenting about it was wrong, incorrect, or inappropriate .... and that *I* would like to hear more about its technical details and performance, which I presume others who enjoy being more than Pentax 'brand cheerleaders' would also.
I said nothing negative to or about Ken until he decided to pick a fight for no reason at all and acted in such a condescending manner. My comment wasn't even directed at Ken, it was rhetorical. If he wants to act childishly, I can do without him. It is never my intent or desire to insult someone, and that's exactly what he was intending/ doing with his insinuations and condescension although he claims otherwise. As you, and others, have so often stated, there is no "value" to this list anyway. It exists for informal discussion and banter, supposedly between friendly persons. It is not a source of information from Pentax. I subscribe because there is some fun banter, occasionally useful information and I can assist a few people occasionally. Can't take that: don't read my posts. I don't care if you do or don't, that's up to you. G On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:36 AM, John Francis wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:24:38AM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: >> >> You can take your condescension and bullshit with you into the trash >> bucket, Ken. > > And the rest of us would be happier if you took your own advice. > Take your childish playground tantrums to email, if you must. On Mar 9, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Tom C wrote: > I agree. Really no one likes to be told what they can/cannot talk > about on > an unmoderated list. > > Ken's discussion of the aesthetics of the Sony mockup were not off > topic, > inappropriate, or offensive. > > > Tom C. > > >> From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: New Sony >> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 12:31:56 -0700 >> >> "I surf certain limited number of camera site in Japan and when I >> encounter something which might be of interest to PDMLers, I try to >> share them." >> >> Ken has now unsubbed from the list. He participates in Japanese >> discussion fora and has taken the time to translate long documents >> for >> us. He has been our best source of accurate information. Now we have >> lost him. The value of this list is much diminished. >> >> Joe -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
