If that's all the "middle men" did you'd be right.  They do a hell of a 
lot more than that.  The view you express was discredited 150 years ago.

mike wilson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>   
>> In a message dated 3/12/2007 7:47:54 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Er, no.  The crops would be slightly  more expensive but would still be 
>> there.
>>
>> ============
>> Citizens, on the  whole, won't pick crops.
>>
>> In California, the biggest pool of  housecleaners, caregivers, gardeners, 
>> and 
>> casual day laborers (mainly  construction), is also illegals. No one else 
>> will do the work. In my immediate  area there are a lot of Tongans filling 
>> those 
>> posts. Not all CA illegals are  Latino. Any country that has a depressed 
>> economy will have some illegals in  California. The average stay for an 
>> illegal is 
>> two years. They make their money  and go home.(I saw the results of study 
>> once, though admittedly a study was  probably hard to do.) I used to live in 
>> an 
>> area with a check cashing place that  I used. That area also had a lot of 
>> illegals -- they used the check cashing  place to send money home each week. 
>> It also 
>> had a phone where they could call  home if they paid enough.
>>
>> Besides we have to compete with places like  Mexico that grow crops where 
>> the 
>> pickers are paid squat. (Not to mention that  small CA farmers, as in not 
>> agribusiness, operate on small margins). And other  foreign countries were 
>> the 
>> pay is terrible. Competing with third world countries  is just a fact of 
>> life 
>> now.
>>
>> If decent wages had to be paid for all crop  picking, decent enough for no 
>> illegals being hired, most of CA's remaining  agricultural would crash 
>> (despite 
>> agribusiness and some crops that don't have to  be picked by hand. There are 
>> many hand picked crops here.). In fact, several  small economies in CA would 
>> crash.
>>     
>
> I saw some figures recently that suggested that the labour cost involved 
> in crop picking was somewhat less than 1/10th of the retail price at the 
> most.  You could double the wages and the retail price would only go up 
> marginally.  Most cost is added by the middlemen who do nothing but move 
> the stuff around.
>
>   
>>  
>> What is and what "should be" are two different things.
>>
>> Marnie aka  Doe 
>>  
>> <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free 
>> email to everyone.  Find out more about what's free from AOL at 
>> http://www.aol.com.
>>
>>     
>
>
>   


-- 
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf 
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to