Or he's technologically illiterate, and is just parroting a buzzword for something similar to what he was actually told.
Adam Maas wrote: > David Savage wrote: > >> On 3/18/07, Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> http://pentaxlife.com/forum/topic/39?replies=1 >>> >>> The poster is a professional with ties to Pentax. But the 1.25 crop >>> sensor and FF rumors makes no sense considering Pentax's current lens >>> development strategy. And who would make those 12 mp sensors? >>> >> This reads like someone thinking out loud. I'd be very surprised if >> this guy had that good an inside source that he can accurately predict >> 2 years into the future. >> >> I can make predictions too, but I sure as H ain't no Nostradamus ;-) >> >> WRT FF, it'll be interesting to see if the new DA* lenses cover the >> full 35mm frame. If so, it'll show that Pentax are thinking about it. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave >> >> > > The gotcha is Bluetooth. Lots of people, like this guy, have sources > which indicate 'high-speed' bluetooth support in new cameras, which > never arrive. That's because bluetooth is a low-bandwidth technology > which is pretty much useless on a camera. It's just too slow (High Speed > bluetooth can handle low-quality audio but not images, it's only a > couple megs a second). Wireless support on cameras will be 802.11g or n, > which are fast enough to be usefull (This is what the current wireless > dongles for the Nikon and Canon pro bodies use). The only way Bluetooth > will show up in Cameras is as a replacement for IR and wired remotes > (Which is the sort of thing it's designed for). > > If the guy posting the rumours says Bluetooth, the rumour is likely bogus. > > -Adam > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
