graywolf wrote: >Ok, just for the hell of it. The general opinion here is that digital is >better than film, so how about everyone posting a photo that they took >with digital that they feel they could not, or would not, have done with >film. > >-graywolf > >
While I disagree that Digital is better than film (it's just different, and I prefer working with film), I do have a few shots that I would simply not have got with film. This is one of my favourites. It was shot with the *istD and 18-55 DA at ISO 3200 on a rainy, dreary day, and the rendering was heavily modified in ACR. http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/58353764/in/set-72157594316203966 Large (and direct link for those who dislike Flickr): http://farm1.static.flickr.com/29/58353764_bce198c2f7_b.jpg -Adam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
