Tom Rittenhouse wrote: >I read this and the other comments deniging the MX. Most MX were bought by >very serious photographers who used them heavily unlike most ME, ME Super >cameras which spent the last twenty years in a sock drawer. I had two MX >bought in 78, and 80 which I used ten years, five of them >semi-professionally. The only problem was mirror misalignment on the chrome >one after being dropped. > >It amazes me how people who buy a worn out 20 plus year old camera are sure >those cameras were junk to start with. The MX was a rugged professional >camera however any camera tends to become junk after a few thousand rolls >of >film have been run through it. Read how many folks on this list treat their >MX and think how many other cameras will stand up to that kind of abuse.
Hear, hear! -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
