> > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2007/05/01 Tue PM 08:04:39 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Judging Photos > > mike wilson wrote: > > >I think that the possible subtleties of "chemical" pictures are being > >lost/abandoned in favour of "smack'em in the eye" colour and graphic > >composition. > > I don't think this is happening. One might get the impression that it > is so only because we see so many images on the web: On a computer > monitor "smack'em in the eye" often works better than the kind of > subtlety that a good print can exhibit (imainly because of size > limitations). If you look at what's being done in print from from > digital, you won't notice any tendency away from subtlty and nuance.
How do most people view most images these days? Even "photographers" look at a screen more than a print, I suspect. ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
