AlexG wrote:

>Scott,
>
>If you're serious about dropping 30 lbs by end of summer, I'd like to
>hop on your bandwagon. I'm being told I look good (over two years went
>from 240lbs to 195. Big change, but I'm still not happy. Still a BFF
>(big fat f***). I wanna hit 150, that way my muscles will actually
>show instead of being concealed in a layer of lard.
>
>I think we can all motivate each other by posting progress pics and
>info, as well as tips and info on workout programs and all that stuff.
>I'm into road biking myself. Bike cost ~1.6K, but that's only because
>I splurged on the frame.... www.habcycles.com. The rest is stuff I
>bought from different spots. Saved tons of money and got much better
>hear for the price.
>
>If I were doing it all again, I'd have gone friction shifting all the
>way. To hell with indexing. I HATE it. It stinks. requires constant
>adjustments and the benefits are not worth it, especially cost
>factored in, not to mention friction era parts last longer.....
>
>My advice as far as buying a bike, piece it together. 60-130 bucks for
>a nice Al frame and you're good to go. Gear 'too heavy'? Drink less
>beer and drop poundage for free! It'll make a bigger difference than
>shaving a few grams off something stupid, like a "lightweight race
>chain" or "magnesium race-light derailleur limit screws!!11"
>
>Anyway, I hope we can all sign on for this, (set goal, set plan, and
>stick to it by reporting progress). Who's in?
>
>  
>

I'm working on the weight loss too. Currently approx 280lb (I'm a BIG 
guy) and my goal is 250 by the end of september. Doing about 90km of 
commuting a week along with distance rides on the weekend, mostly on a 
singlespeed.

Note that piecing together a bike is only a good idea if you know 
exactly what you're doing. Generally the big companies get better breaks 
on parts than you do, so a decent bike normally costs less than a pieced 
together one unless you are an eBay wiz. Generally the low-end race spec 
is the best compromise between weight, performance and durability ( 
Shimano 105 or Campy Veloce on road bikes, Shimano LX or SRAM x.9 on 
MTB's), upgrading from there only gets lower weights and occasionally a 
few nifty features. Never, ever, ever buy the top-end cassettes 
though(XTR, Dura-Ace, Record), they are very low-mileage lightweight 
designs for race use only. And Indexing shouldn't require constant 
attention with good parts. It's fiddly while the cables stretch but once 
everything's broken it you're good for a while. If your bike needs 
constant tuning, you've got either a parts mismatch or another issue 
(chainline, bent derailleur or some such)

-Adam




-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to