Square one for those guys is square 96 for me. But I can lose most of 6 months work by dropping out for a month. Which I keep doing do to health problems, so at best I am maintaining the status quo. But I guess that is better than getting fatter.
AlexG wrote: > Well, that's not necessarily true. > > Somewhere on this intarweb I found a PDF copy of the Navy SEAL > physical fitness manual and they say that you can lose a significant > 'amount' (?) of cardio fitness within the span of two weeks if you > don't train. Stop training for a month and you are right back to > square 1. > > > Kind of depressing when you think about it > > On 5/4/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 5/4/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> You're obviously in better shape than I, I'm running 44x16 right now, >>> but I also have delusions of one day climbing the Bathurst St hill at >>> Davenport on the way home. >> <snip> >> >> Me? >> >> Better shape than you? >> >> Was there ever any doubt? >> >> ;-) >> >> Seriously, I just checked, and my 49x17 translates to 77.82 gear >> inches, while your 44x16 is 74.25. I know the hill to which you >> refer, and it is a bit of a pig: steep, but thankfully short. Ya >> just gotta get up a head of steam! ;-) I guess due to my days as a >> courier, I still have remnants of semi-decent cardiovascular >> fitness... >> >> cheers, >> frank >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
