I agree with Paul. Consider K1D that is same as K10D but has proper 16 bit RAW files and some minor goodies. It will be both a breakthrough and a new flagship model.
On 5/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can be sure it will work with > DA lenses. They wouldn't be introducing a full line of expensive lenses for > cameras that can't use them. So FF is definitely a no go. > Paul > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Digital Image Studio wrote: > > > > >But they just can't go on increasing the density of APS sized sensor > > >ad infinitum, it will only end in tears. > > > > It's true. If the K1D is 14 megapixels as reported, it'll certainly > > have to have a larger sensor than APS-C if they're going to meet users' > > (ever-increasing) demands for low noise. (I would expect around a 1.3 > > crop to keep it usable with current DA lenses.) > > > > Here's a sobering statistic I just read: > > Even if Canon pushes the upcoming 1Ds-III up to 22 megapixels as > > rumored it will still have *lower* pixel density (that is, larger > > pixels) than the Nikon D2x does *now* at 12 megapixels. > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
