But that was before, (when Pentax had pinned it's professional hopes on the 645d), everything changed recently, but no one has really noticed.
William Robb wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "P. J. Alling" > Subject: Re: Pentax - Selling HQ and Apparently Drops 645D > > > >> Logic, yes. Start from incorrect assumptions and follow them to the >> logical incorrect conclusion. Not that I'm saying Paul is wrong, just >> that even impeccable logic doesn't guarantee he's right. >> > > > One needn't look farther than the lens roadmap to see that they don't have > the intent to produce lenses that will cover a 24x36 format sensor. > It's not much of a leap to be safe in the presumption that they don't have > plans to produce a camera that they aren't planning on producing lenses for. > > William Robb > > > >>> >>>> Whatever size sensor Pentax uses in the K1D, we can be sure it will >>>> work with DA lenses. They wouldn't be introducing a full line of >>>> expensive lenses for cameras that can't use them. So FF is definitely >>>> a no go. >>>> > > > > -- Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
