In the real world no one with even a bit of common sense would convert a RAW at default settings. The whole idea of shooting RAW is to optimize the image. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On 11.05.2007, at 15:37 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > So ... are you proposing that because you perceive Olympus' > > profitability to be stronger than Pentax', we should abandon and dump > > our Pentax gear and buy Olympus gear? Not that it would bother me ... > > the latest generation of Olympus/Panasonic/Leica DSLR bodies are > > quite good performers and the Olympus Zuiko and Leica lenses being > > produced for the 4/3 System lens mount are excellent. You can also > > use Nikon, Canon, Pentax and other lenses on them with available > > adapters. > Well, according to one of the first E-410 tests new sensor + new in- > camera image processing lowered noise and greatly increased sharpness > of JPEG files straight from the camera. Actually JPEG form this Oly > at "0" sharpness setting produces sharper images than RAW from K10D > converted in Aperture at default settings (I know it because I wrote > K10D test for this page taking similar test shots). Here is the test > with sample photos: > http://www.fotopolis.pl/index.php?n=5829&p=3 > > > Cheers, > Sylwek > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
