I find DPreview forum participants, have softer images than we do here at the PDML.
Nikons not included. L;OL Dave On 5/14/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The major issue I have with Phil is his insistence on testing primarily > in JPEG mode. His tests are designed for, and quite good for, P&S > cameras. They do not adequately reflect real-world SLR performance. > > -Adam > > > Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > DPReview.com's review data is pretty good on specifications and > > features but his tests and judgments are of questionable credibility. > > > > Many people take what's said in the tests as being hard fact, which > > is misinformed. > > > > Thus it is a source of misinformation. > > > > G > > > > > > On May 14, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > >> That's my point. I find dpreview to be among the best sites out > >> there for > >> camera reviews and comparing features. At times some may disagree > >> with the > >> conclusions that are reached, but in terms of kinds of tests, > >> quality of > >> tests, it's far more exhaustive than any of us are with our own > >> cameras. > >> > >> Hence my disagreement about it being a source of misinformation. > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
