Not arguing with you Adam. For probably 80% of the people out there, the .jpg tests are the only ones to matter, even with DSLR's. I have seen RAW tests out there as well (of course you did say primarily).
Tom C. >From: Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Amazon buys dpreview.com >Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 22:58:26 -0400 > >The major issue I have with Phil is his insistence on testing primarily >in JPEG mode. His tests are designed for, and quite good for, P&S >cameras. They do not adequately reflect real-world SLR performance. > >-Adam > > >Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > DPReview.com's review data is pretty good on specifications and > > features but his tests and judgments are of questionable credibility. > > > > Many people take what's said in the tests as being hard fact, which > > is misinformed. > > > > Thus it is a source of misinformation. > > > > G > > > > > > On May 14, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > >> That's my point. I find dpreview to be among the best sites out > >> there for > >> camera reviews and comparing features. At times some may disagree > >> with the > >> conclusions that are reached, but in terms of kinds of tests, > >> quality of > >> tests, it's far more exhaustive than any of us are with our own > >> cameras. > >> > >> Hence my disagreement about it being a source of misinformation. > > > > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
