Then point me to where there is anything better. The same can be said for virtually any news or information source. Most people, being woefully uninformed to begin, with require a laymen's interpretation of the data which I think the site does a pretty good job of.
Tom C. >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: Amazon buys dpreview.com >Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:28:43 -0700 > >DPReview.com's review data is pretty good on specifications and >features but his tests and judgments are of questionable credibility. > >Many people take what's said in the tests as being hard fact, which >is misinformed. > >Thus it is a source of misinformation. > >G > > >On May 14, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > That's my point. I find dpreview to be among the best sites out > > there for > > camera reviews and comparing features. At times some may disagree > > with the > > conclusions that are reached, but in terms of kinds of tests, > > quality of > > tests, it's far more exhaustive than any of us are with our own > > cameras. > > > > Hence my disagreement about it being a source of misinformation. > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
