I don't care one whit about "most people". That's the equivalent of the Fox InfoTainment Service "Some People Say..." bullshit: that is, it says "we know best, won't quote sources or tell you how we know, but will tell you what the truth is and you should believe it". Utter nonsense.
I'm talking to what I would hope are informed photographers on this list, not to "most people". Perhaps I'm wrong about that. I go to review sites to obtain the specifications and any data acquired by testing about the cameas, as well as see detailed photographs of the item in question. I want to know the testing methodologies in detail. I don't bother reading 'informed opinions translating for laymen', or walking through 26 stupid screen shots of menus that are all well detailed in the downloadable instruction manual, it's a waste of my time. As both test data and informed opinion goes, Klaus at www.photozone.de has done an excellent job. G On May 15, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Tom C wrote: > Then point me to where there is anything better. The same can be > said for > virtually any news or information source. Most people, being woefully > uninformed to begin, with require a laymen's interpretation of the > data > which I think the site does a pretty good job of. > > Tom C. > > >> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: Amazon buys dpreview.com >> Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 17:28:43 -0700 >> >> DPReview.com's review data is pretty good on specifications and >> features but his tests and judgments are of questionable credibility. >> >> Many people take what's said in the tests as being hard fact, which >> is misinformed. >> >> Thus it is a source of misinformation. >> >> G >> >> >> On May 14, 2007, at 4:36 PM, Tom C wrote: >> >>> That's my point. I find dpreview to be among the best sites out >>> there for >>> camera reviews and comparing features. At times some may disagree >>> with the >>> conclusions that are reached, but in terms of kinds of tests, >>> quality of >>> tests, it's far more exhaustive than any of us are with our own >>> cameras. >>> >>> Hence my disagreement about it being a source of misinformation. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
