[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> >On the few occassions I've shot for the NY Times, they've asked only >> for hi-res jpegs. I shot RAW, but they never requested the original >> files. However, none of these were for what you would call "hard news" >> stories. >> >> And I expect they may be stricter with photogs who are full-time >> employees. >> >Since any concerns would have to do with retouching, I would think >they would be stricter with freelance stringers.
I dunno. I expect their responsibility (both legally and in terms of bad publicity) is greater if it's their own staff doing something inappropriate than if it's a contractor. You may be right, but I find it hard to imagine the New York Times taking more chances than the Charlotte Observer. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
