On 06/07/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ROFLMAO. Why would the fact that SPARX was a shareholder make Hoya > want to buy? That only meant Hoya would have to pay more.
Sparx (Strategic Portfolio Analysis Research eXperts) are specifically in the business of buying undervalued stock, enhancing the value of the stock then cashing in, that's what they do and they do it well. After they sell their Pentax stock to Hoya Sparx will have made more net profit out of Pentax during the time that they have held Pentax stock than Pentax have made net profit during the same period. It's all public record. Check the following article and you'll gain some insight into their MO. http://members.forbes.com/global/2002/1014/058.html -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
