Paul Stenquist wrote: >Yes, enough is enough. And if the photo.net model of peer evaluation >is any indication of how well this might work. Well, it won't. Not a >good idea in my estimation.
>From the way I read it, they seem to be asking for input from gallery contributors, but not choosing photos by that means exclusively. In other words, their judges will still have some (I'd guess, final) say. No telling for certain but if this is the case but I'd say it's a good idea: Get gallery members to separate the wheat from the chaff and then have the official judges make the final cut. They certainly need to do *something* to reduce their turnaround time. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
