I had a similar thought, but in reality he's already exposed *himself*. He posted his name at least one place on that site, including the vicinity of his residence. A simple lookup in the public local phone directory yields his phone number and address.
And, none of this would have occurred if he hadn't misappropriated the images. Tom C. >From: John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Stolen Photos >Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:27:30 -0400 > >Don't get YOURSELVES in trouble over this. The photos were taken down. >If Tom contacts the newspaper again and points out the thumbnails are >still up, they'll take them down too, > >But you're crossing over a line into net stalking. > >From: >Paul Sorenson > > Here you go... > > > > S*** D**** > > BOISE, ID 83702 > > (208) 3**-**** > > > > S*** D**** > > BOISE, ID 83702 > > (208) 3**-**** > > > > -p > > > > Tom C wrote: > >> I don't get anything but empty fields and no info when I clicked on > >> the link. What did it say? Thanks. There's probably a 50/50 chance > >> he works at the same place I do also. > >> > >> Tom C. > > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
