At which point I would hand them my business card and ask, "Am I supposed to produce crappy photos when I do them for myself?" And anyone with a computer can print up business cards. Also, lousy photographers are not protected by copyright laws???
But once again I ask, who gave you law enforcement authority? You are just like those security guards that like to pretend they are cops. If someone is breaking the law call the cops, let them make the decision. Otherwise you may wind up harassing someone who can afford to make you seriously regret it. graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- William Robb wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Digital Image Studio" > Subject: Re: DMCA Takedown (was Stolen Photos) > > > >> That's all fair enough given the laws however how do you determine >> what images the customer owns copyright to? Obviously only images >> produced when the particular individual pushed the shutter are their >> copyright anything else plainly is not, even if it's contained on the >> same roll of film/memory card. How far are you supposed to follow the >> law on the gov'ts behalf? > > If the picture looks too good to be an amateur snapshot, then the lab needs > proof of ownership. > > William Robb > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
