frank theriault wrote: >On 7/13/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That's exactly the way I thought when first making the framing comment. >> I had no thought of fixing it, just offering what night be viewed as a >> helpful comment if, as is ofter true of me, it were an element that may >> have been in question any way. >> I didn't assume Frank wasn't aware of it. > >Well, that's certainly the way I took it, Jack. > >I won't "reshoot" it - these sorts of things attract my attention from >time to time, so I pull out my camera, but for me, if I ~try~ to set >something like that up, it never works. That's why I'd be a crappy >studio photographer. But, next time (if there is one) I'll be more >conscious of framing. > >What I liked about it (light and shadows) is still there, and quite >frankly, despite the framing shortcoming, I still like the photo. No >photo is "perfect", least of all mine - for me, everything's a >compromise on some level, and this compromise is one I can live with. > >It's been an interesing discussion, though!
It has... and just to bollox it up further I'll add that I *like* the original photo as-is and I'm not bothered at all by the bottom of the cup being out of frame! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
