On 7/13/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's exactly the way I thought when first making the framing comment. > I had no thought of fixing it, just offering what night be viewed as a > helpful comment if, as is ofter true of me, it were an element that may > have been in question any way. > I didn't assume Frank wasn't aware of it. >
Well, that's certainly the way I took it, Jack. I won't "reshoot" it - these sorts of things attract my attention from time to time, so I pull out my camera, but for me, if I ~try~ to set something like that up, it never works. That's why I'd be a crappy studio photographer. But, next time (if there is one) I'll be more conscious of framing. What I liked about it (light and shadows) is still there, and quite frankly, despite the framing shortcoming, I still like the photo. No photo is "perfect", least of all mine - for me, everything's a compromise on some level, and this compromise is one I can live with. It's been an interesing discussion, though! cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
