On 14/07/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One thing I have discovered though, is that while one can fix a bunch of > stuff in post processing, it is still best to get it right in camera, and > not waste your life fiddling with a substandard image later.
Right in camera or not I find myself these days devoting much time to post processing trying to reduce the effects of the limitations of the equipment. If the photographer is perfectly happy remain photographically within the technical bounds of the equipment then that's great for them but for me the resolution, angle of view, dynamic range and distortions can all be improved upon using various post processing techniques. So these days the camera is just my capture device, the serious work happens well after the shot was taken. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
