And since when did we care that WalMart's film processing was down to next to nothing? I readily admit that I do run of the mill snapshots with my digi, only makes sense. I would not go back to film for eBay shots. Serious photography is still done with the big flash snapshot camera. And normally one holder (2 shots) is enough for one subject. The only problem is that I have not been doing much serious (fun) photography lately, but that has nothing at all to do with digital vs. film. It has to do with energy and money, lack of same.
Remember, "REAL photographers" use a Speed Graphic, Weegee said so. <GRIN!> http://www.graywolfphoto.com/presscameras/weegee.html graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" ----------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since when is it necessary for a film photographer to take lots of > pictures? I went out today and took pictures using a Stereo Realist > camera. I did one roll. I was deliberate in my stereo photography so get > the best effect. Sorry I won't make my local film processor happy by not > taking lots and lots of pictures. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
