The 55 f1.8 SMC pentax gives the AOV ~85mm, (if you think that the 
actual multiplication factor is actually closer to 1.55x).  It makes a 
dandy portrait lens on an "APS-C" sensor, and they're dirt cheap.

George Sinos wrote:
> Interesting that you mention the 50mm.  I'm taking a portrait
> photography course.  The instructor recommended finding a 50mm 1.8
> lens.  It seems at 75mm equivalent, with that wide aperture, it's a
> fine portrait lens.
>
> See you later, gs
> http://georgesphotos.net
>
> On 8/5/07, Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> I do have to agree that a plain old photography course should be taught
>> in the digital medium.  Quite simply, it*s the dominant medium for
>> those who take snapshots and those who do photography for a living.  If
>> people are going to have digital cameras in their hands, that that*s
>> what they should use when they learn.  Whenever  there is a paradigm
>> shift, there is always a tendency to include the older approach
>> *because it*s the best way to learn*,  Unfortunately, it*s
>> mostly the older generation trying to recapitulate their learning path
>> for the new kids.  The better approach is to work up some new pedagogy
>> appropriate to the new techniques.  I*m not saying playing in a
>> darkroom wouldn*t expand your understanding of light, exposure, etc.,
>> but it*s no longer the best way to start.  You have to learn on the
>> tool you*re going to use.  Of course, the language will change as
>> well.  If the APS-C sensor sticks around then younger photographers will
>> think of the 50 mm as a short telephoto.  To me, this is as it should
>> be.  Hell, I*M starting to think like that.
>>
>>     
>>>>> Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/4/2007 10:28 PM >>>
>>>>>           
>> There are some minor benefits to teaching photography the old way,
>> but it's quickly becoming an anachronism. For today's photographer
>> learning digital processing is much more important than learning to
>> work with chemicals. That's a dead end. You can teach exposure
>> without having to force students to shoot with antiques. Just set up
>> some heavily weighted exposure compensation situations and make them
>> work for their knowledge. Studying Latin is more productive than
>> studying film photography.
>> Paul
>> On Aug 4, 2007, at 6:44 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>
>>     
>
>   


-- 
The difference between Microsoft and 'Jurassic Park':
In one, a mad businessman makes a lot of money with beasts that should be 
extinct.
The other is a film.
  -- Unattributed 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Reply via email to